![]() ![]() Only time will tell if Final Cut Pro will regain the momentum lost during the rocky transition period.Īs is the case with most Apple software, Final Cut Pro will only work on Mac OS X. ![]() While not ultimately fatal to Final Cut Pro X as a product, these reasons were enough for many video editors to take another look at competitor offerings, in particular Adobe Premiere Pro.įortunately for Final Cut Pro loyalists, Apple has continued to refine Final Cut Pro X and to add missing features to the point that reviews of recent releases are much more positive. Unfortunately for long time Final Cut Pro users and for Apple, the initial releases of Final Cut Pro X were both too different from the previous version of Final Cut Pro, as well as missing needed features that were present in the previous versions. Then, at NAB 2011, Apple announced a radical rewrite of the much beloved Final Cut Pro to be released under the name Final Cut Pro X. Up until 2011, Apple continued to develop Final Cut Pro to the point that it was competitive with the then dominant Avid Media Composer while being a fraction of the price of a full Avid system. Initially developed by Macromedia, the video editing software that eventually became Final Cut Pro was bought by Apple in 1998 with the first release of Final Cut Pro being made in 1999. Beyond that are considerations as to what other software is either bundled or available as an option - typical video editing software systems extend beyond the core features of non-linear editing software and often support advanced color grading, motion graphics, visual effects and multi-channel audio processing. That said, each has its own approach to video editing and one may be better suited to a particular workflow than another. Each of these are packed with features to get you from a collection of source footage to a final cut as quickly as possible and with the highest quality possible. These days, professional video editing software often means one of Avid Media Composer, Adobe Premiere Pro or Apple Final Cut Pro. To the extent that it helps, we'll break the contenders down into categories. Which video editing software you ultimately choose is going to depend on a number of factors ranging from what capabilities you need to how much you are willing to spend. In case you decided to download the program, follow the link.So, you have a bunch of video and you want to edit it together into something that tells a story - you're going to need some video editing software. To download any of them you will have to fill in you personal data, as it is a custom these days. There are MAC OS X and Windows version available. However, even then you will get an extremely powerful software which can be used for commercial purposes no restricted project saving and exporting or watermarks we all know from trial versions. You will also be restricted to using only 2 grading nodes, one GPU and one RED rocket card. ![]() We will also miss the stereoscopic 3D, picture noise reduction, power mastering, remote grading and sharing the projects with an external database server. So what is missing compared to the full version? The main difference is the ability to work only a resolution up to Full HD, so we will have to moit grading in 2K and higher. However, if you are an independent film maker and your resources are very limited, you now have the opportunity to download a completely legal lite version, which, compared to the paid version, is mission a few functions, but it can still be very useful to you. There is also a software only version which you can get for a decent $1.000. Its full version comes with its own control surface and if you want to buy it, you will need to prepare $30.000. It offers a mind blowing amount of gradiing tools and many other functions such as picture stabilization. DaVinci Resolve is one of the most used professional color grading software tools in the world. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |